Future me/Past me in the 2.0 digital world (Thing 23)

23 Things taught me that I actually know a lot more than I thought I did about Web 2.0. It turns out that I had intuited my way through this brave new world with such people in it, and I shocked myself more by own proficiency than by the challenges.

I tried to take the hardest path on every Thing, taking on the challenges instead of taking the easy path through technology I was comfortable with. I emphasize “tried,” however, because I know I wasn’t perfect and that I didn’t always take the harder path when it was before me.

What I most look forward to learning more about is podcasting myself. For my family, I would love to podcast to my nephews who live back home in Kentucky. For reasons of vanity, I just think podcast anecdotes would be fun to include on my personal blog.

I really enjoyed the 23 Things and honestly have no suggestions for improvement. I felt there were learning opportunities for all levels of experience and instructions were always clear and entertaining. I liked that there were blog prompts to keep Thing-ers on track and that there were Challenges for ambitious Thing-ers to really push their skills.

I’m glad NEFLIN plans to leave the 23 Things posted so that I can revisit Things and follow more links. The more information I am equipped with, the more I can share my knowledge with others.

(Thing 22) Janus: Looking back, looking forward

When I look back at Thing 1, I see myself reaching for new tools as I instantly added Google Analytics to my site and a widget for links in my blog sidebar. I was eager to learn more L2.0, and I couldn’t wait to read others’ blogs. I still check in on other blogs from time-to-time, but I have to admit I’ve cut back on that. I hope my 23 Things pals keep up on their blogs and let me see that window into their library world. I also wanted to use my 23 Things to network, and since meeting Jim Morris at Lake City Community College and linking up with some people through blog comments, I think I’ve succeeded at that.

I am about to take a NEFLIN course on Drupal, and I hope the class can spur my resolution to stay on top of my 23 Things blog. 23 Things has inspired me to always look for more links and to chain to new places. I want to resolve to write about my future discoveries and conquests and continue to explore links on 23 Things that I had to skip.

Thanks, 23 Things, for bringing me a huge network of links to follow. I look forward to learning more.

(Thing 21) Research my research

As soon as I read Thing 21, I started ROFLing. As a student, I would have plugged in all my data at the start of the semester, tuned out every e-mail reminder, and crunch it all at the last minute. As a professional, I can think of tons of reasons to use calendar tools to help keep me on track with events like upcoming conferences.

The “About RPC” states: “The traditional details of bibliography cards, outlines, citation formats, etc. often result in a view of the research process as daunting and tedious. Our goal is to help you bring the student to see the research process as empowering and rewarding.” I remember looking at bibliography cards as ridiculous as an undergraduate, then learning how significant a role they can play in crafting a good research paper in graduate school. A tool that helps students learn how to conduct research in a format they’re probably already familiar with—digital—brings the project from “tedious” to manageable.

Even facing resistance from professors about sharing in the research process, librarians can still participate when those one-shot information literacy students enter the library classroom. Assuming that the professor is skilled at the instructional principles of conducting a research project, the library instructor need only send a brief e-mail to the professor to see what his or her research topic will be for the semester. If the librarian reaches resistance even to this, a quick course catalog review of the course description should give an understanding of core themes. Adapting the RPC principles of research to guide him or her, the librarian steps into the role of research mentor in the information literacy course. As I’ve seen similar skills implemented at Flagler College, the research mentor role plays out when students ask for “that librarian that taught my class that one time.” Clearly, some information connection is at work between student and librarian.

(Thing 20) Read it! Online, offline—reading skills

First, a few fragments from my experience exploring the “Learn” section of Thing 20:

• Added TwitterLit.com to my Twitter. I love to Twitter, and I love to read—this seemed like an obvious union of two of my hobbies.

• Reading Trails sounds like the way I use the internet, following links to create the paths I want to pursue, but I didn’t join at this time as I have a big enough book backlog.

• BookBrowse also looks like exactly my thing, giving me Amazon style recommendations based on what’s popular and providing reader reviews.

When I receive reference requests from students at Flagler College, most are disappointed when we have access to an ebook only and not an actual hardcover print copy. “You don’t have that as a regular book?” is a question I get all the time. However, there are students who are thrilled about ebooks. They can go home and use their own computers to access the ebooks at their digital pace. They can print pages from their home computer and choose what chapters to follow based on “Search in text” features.

Last week, I had a student approach me with a journal and ask how she could print it. She only wanted a digital version, not the awkward bulky bound print. I was a little shocked, but I showed her how to use the photocopier to get what she wanted. There were only two pages from the article that interested her, which makes me think of “micro-research,” like following hyperlinks to get only the text you need.

I read the article “Literacy Debate: Online, R U Really Reading?” in the New York Times. I really connected with the concept of digital reading and its unique literacy, and I’d like to respond to a few quotes from the article.

“One early study showed that giving home Internet access to low-income students appeared to improve standardized reading test scores and school grades. ‘These were kids who would typically not be reading in their free time,’ said Linda A. Jackson, a psychology professor at Michigan State who led the research. ‘Once they’re on the Internet, they’re reading.’”

Children suffer if they are in a digital divide, a group which often includes low-income and minority students. As the article mentioned, students who do not develop internet skills may not become valuable employees. Their skill-sets may not match requirements of higher paying jobs in the Information Age.

“’Kids are using sound and images so they have a world of ideas to put together that aren’t necessarily language oriented,’ said Donna E. Alvermann, a professor of language and literacy education at the University of Georgia. ‘Books aren’t out of the picture, but they’re only one way of experiencing information in the world today.’”

Watching my husband teach digital literacy, art of film and video, and web-based skills, I directly see the way reading and interpreting audio and visual literacy plays into the skill set he teaches. The Flagler College Communication Department teaches information literacy as a core concept of their required major coursework. For the students’ future careers, multiple media formats are necessary to communicate effectively with diverse audiences, a trend growing across many majors.

Some critics argue that the digital age is destroying literacy, but my experience is that digital literacy is altering the meaning of traditional literacy concepts. As more libraries evolve to Web 2.0 concepts, digital literacy is necessary as much for the practitioners as it is for the users. How could I have completed Thing 20 without knowing to chain through a cloud of hyperlinks?